lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] net: use this_cpu_xxx replace percpu_xxx funcs
On 02.12.2011 03:33, Alex,Shi wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 17:00 +0800, Alex,Shi wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 16:38 +0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> Le jeudi 20 octobre 2011 à 15:32 +0800, Alex,Shi a écrit :
>>>> percpu_xxx funcs are duplicated with this_cpu_xxx funcs, so replace them
>>>> for further code clean up.
>>>>
>>>> And in preempt safe scenario, __this_cpu_xxx funcs has a bit better
>>>> performance since __this_cpu_xxx has no redundant preempt_disable()
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> net/netfilter/xt_TEE.c | 12 ++++++------
>>>> net/socket.c | 4 ++--
>>>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Thanks !
>>
>> Anyone like to pick up this patch? or more comments for this?
>
> Kaber, David:
> I appreciate for your any comments on this. Could you like do me a
> favor?

No objections from me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-02 13:11    [W:0.090 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site