Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 02 Dec 2011 12:56:48 +0100 | From | Patrick McHardy <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: use this_cpu_xxx replace percpu_xxx funcs |
| |
On 02.12.2011 03:33, Alex,Shi wrote: > On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 17:00 +0800, Alex,Shi wrote: >> On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 16:38 +0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: >>> Le jeudi 20 octobre 2011 à 15:32 +0800, Alex,Shi a écrit : >>>> percpu_xxx funcs are duplicated with this_cpu_xxx funcs, so replace them >>>> for further code clean up. >>>> >>>> And in preempt safe scenario, __this_cpu_xxx funcs has a bit better >>>> performance since __this_cpu_xxx has no redundant preempt_disable() >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> >>>> --- >>>> net/netfilter/xt_TEE.c | 12 ++++++------ >>>> net/socket.c | 4 ++-- >>>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >>> >>> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> >>> >>> Thanks ! >> >> Anyone like to pick up this patch? or more comments for this? > > Kaber, David: > I appreciate for your any comments on this. Could you like do me a > favor?
No objections from me. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |