Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:21:53 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] usb: musb: fix pm_runtime mismatches | From | Felipe Contreras <> |
| |
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote: > On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> > Should these calls be pm_runtime_put_sync() instead of >> > pm_runtime_put()? >> >> I don't see why... The thing failed, it's not going to be used any >> more so better let PM deactivate the device. > > It's not a big deal. The difference is that pm_runtime_put_sync() > avoids an extra context switch when suspending the device. A minor > optimization, that's all.
Ok, I used what most of the code was using, but I've trusted you and updated the patches. It would probably make sense to do the same in other places.
-- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |