lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: pull request: wireless 2011-12-15
From
W dniu 15 grudnia 2011 22:38 użytkownik John W. Linville
<linville@tuxdriver.com> napisał:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:04:29PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> 2011/12/15 John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>:
>> > commit 42a3b63bb2ca4996a3d1210a004eae2333f1119e
>> >
>> > Dave,
>> >
>> > Here are a few more fixes intended for the 3.2 release.  They are
>> > all small and narrowly focused.
>>
>> John, I've made a mistake and didn't use [PATCH 3.2] header to make it
>> clean my patch is fix. Could you take a look at
>> [PATCH] bcma: support for suspend and resume
>> please?
>>
>> It's not one-liner, but fixes lock ups, which I believe - we really
>> want to avoid.
>
> It's late in the release cycle, and Dave specifically asked me to slow down.
>
> Are these suspend/resume lockups a regression?  Or have they always
> been there?  Do they happen to everyone?

The bug is present since first days of bcma. That's why I even decided
to add stable to CC.

Personally I've tested that only on 1 machine (I don't have more
suspendable machines with mini PCIe slot). However all Macbook 8.1/8.2
users have to remove b43 & bcma before suspending [0], they complain
about that since ever.

Arend: I know you're also complaining for suspend in bcma. Can you
comment on this?

[0] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1695746

--
Rafał
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-16 07:43    [W:0.234 / U:1.276 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site