Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 16 Dec 2011 07:40:16 +0100 | Subject | Re: pull request: wireless 2011-12-15 | From | Rafał Miłecki <> |
| |
W dniu 15 grudnia 2011 22:38 użytkownik John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com> napisał: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:04:29PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> 2011/12/15 John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>: >> > commit 42a3b63bb2ca4996a3d1210a004eae2333f1119e >> > >> > Dave, >> > >> > Here are a few more fixes intended for the 3.2 release. They are >> > all small and narrowly focused. >> >> John, I've made a mistake and didn't use [PATCH 3.2] header to make it >> clean my patch is fix. Could you take a look at >> [PATCH] bcma: support for suspend and resume >> please? >> >> It's not one-liner, but fixes lock ups, which I believe - we really >> want to avoid. > > It's late in the release cycle, and Dave specifically asked me to slow down. > > Are these suspend/resume lockups a regression? Or have they always > been there? Do they happen to everyone?
The bug is present since first days of bcma. That's why I even decided to add stable to CC.
Personally I've tested that only on 1 machine (I don't have more suspendable machines with mini PCIe slot). However all Macbook 8.1/8.2 users have to remove b43 & bcma before suspending [0], they complain about that since ever.
Arend: I know you're also complaining for suspend in bcma. Can you comment on this?
[0] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1695746
-- Rafał -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |