lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: kvm deadlock
On 12/14/2011 04:06 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 04:02:48PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 12/14/2011 04:00 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > The other traces have apparently bogus NMI interrupts, but it might be a
> > > software bug, OK.
> >
> > These are from sysrq-blah, no? I'm looking at them now.
>
> I don't know. Its a hang ? It could be memory corruption (of the timer
> olist) instead of a bogus NMI actually, the second.

Looks like lots of cpus are waiting on the smp_call_function_single()
lock. Looks like rcu is complaining:


[ 4959.814010] [<ffffffff81252e47>] __const_udelay+0x2c/0x2e
[ 4959.814017] [<ffffffff81027449>]
native_safe_apic_wait_icr_idle+0x31/0x3d
[ 4959.814024] [<ffffffff81027f11>]
__default_send_IPI_dest_field.constprop.0+0x23/0x5d
[ 4959.814032] [<ffffffff81027f93>]
default_send_IPI_mask_sequence_phys+0x48/0x97
[ 4959.814039] [<ffffffff81089848>] ? tick_nohz_handler+0xdf/0xdf
[ 4959.814044] [<ffffffff8102b561>] physflat_send_IPI_all+0x17/0x19
[ 4959.814052] [<ffffffff81028102>]
arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace+0x57/0x89
[ 4959.814057] [<ffffffff810c7711>] __rcu_pending+0x89/0x328
[ 4959.814063] [<ffffffff81089848>] ? tick_nohz_handler+0xdf/0xdf
[ 4959.814067] [<ffffffff810c7e0a>] rcu_check_callbacks+0x88/0xb9
[ 4959.814071] [<ffffffff8106aeba>] update_process_times+0x3f/0x75
Maybe the core issue is that CPU 3 is spinning in do_insn_fetch() and
denying rcu grace periods. Nate, can you provide a few more dumps (this
is looking at the second paste, so more of the same)?

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-14 15:31    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans