Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:26:58 +0800 | From | liang tang <> | Subject | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/8] ACPI: add processor driver for Xen virtual CPUs. |
| |
On 2011-12-13 15:45, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 12.12.11 at 18:29, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 09:24:23AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>> On 30.11.11 at 18:21, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote: >>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile >>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile >>>> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_METHOD)+= custom_method.o >>>> # processor has its own "processor." module_param namespace >>>> processor-y := processor_driver.o processor_throttling.o >>>> processor-y += processor_idle.o processor_thermal.o >>>> +processor-y += processor_xen.o >>> This should minimally be processor-$(CONFIG_XEN), with other things >>> adjusted as necessary. >> I was under the impression that this was required to get the >> processor_xen.ko >> to be a module. Otherwise it would only compile as built-in. > processor_xen.ko? Why not have all the code go into processor.ko? > (And the original construct didn't aim in that direction either.) > > Jan > the code about driver function which kernel require(drivers/acpi/processor_xen.c ) build into processor.ko. the code which have more relation with xen (drivers/xen/acpi_processor.c) did not build into processor.ko. liang
| |