[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 14/17] UAPI: Make linux/patchkey.h easier to parse
David Howells <> wrote:

> > Is this part missing, or no longer needed?
> It seems to have got lost somewhere. Thanks for catching it.

Actually, it doesn't seem to be necessary. The header splitter managed to cope
without it and did the right thing. I think what happened was that the
splitter didn't recognise the _LINUX_PATCHKEY_H_INDIRECT thing as a reinclusion
guard, so it just tossed that into the UAPI header, then recognised the
_LINUX_PATCHKEY_H thing as the reinclusion guard and proceeded from there.

Would you prefer that I remove that from the comments or would you prefer that
I leave things unchanged?


 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-13 15:01    [W:0.059 / U:5.396 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site