lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_SHARED ?
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 23:00:01 +0200
Martin-Éric Racine <martin-eric.racine@iki.fi> wrote:

> 12. joulukuuta 2011 22.31 Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
> kirjoitti:
> > On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:41:25 +0100
> > Jens Rottmann <JRottmann@LiPPERTEmbedded.de> wrote:
> >> one of our customers tripped over the fact that the MFGPT driver
> >> won't share its IRQ with anyone else. (MFGPT defaulted to same IRQ
> >> as audio, MFGPT driver loaded first, audio fails.) *No big deal!*
> >> They don't actually need MFGPT and will simply disable it. It just
> >> made me wonder ...
> >>
> >> Why would it be such a bad idea to use IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_SHARED
> >> (see patch below)? mfgpt_tick() already does properly return
> >> IRQ_NONE when it feels unresponsible. I tested it with either
> >> driver loaded first and it seemed to work (well, at least audio
> >> worked, don't know how to explicitly test cs5535-clockevt).
> >
> > Just loading cs5535-clockevt should start the periodic timer.  On my
> > XO-1, IRQ 7 starts firing immediately.
>
> Could it be a good idea to inform udev maintainers of this?
>

It *would* be nice to get it auto-loading..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-12 23:09    [W:0.054 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site