[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v5.1 00/14] crc32c: Add faster algorithm and self-test code
    On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 02:29:11PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:36:59 -0800
    > "Darrick J. Wong" <> wrote:
    > > This patchset (re)uses Bob Pearson's crc32 slice-by-8 code to stamp out a
    > > software crc32c implementation.
    > I think the attributions here are all messed up. As the patches stand,
    > it appears that you wrote all of them. But I don't think that is the
    > case.
    > If Bob wrote a particular patch then that patch should be sent with a
    > From: Bob Pearson <> right at the start
    > of the changelog so that he is recorded as the primary author. If the
    > email sender (ie: you) was the primary author then this attribution can
    > be omitted and we fall back to using the From: from the email headers.
    > Also, every one of these patches should have you own signed-off-by,
    > regardless of its authorship. For reasons explained in
    > Documentation/SubmittingPatches, section 12.
    > Please fix these things up and resend.
    > Also, it would be conventional and useful if each patch title was
    > prefixed by its subsystem identifier. ie, "removed two instances of
    > trailing whitespaces" should be titled "crc32: remove two instances of
    > trailing whitespace" or "lib/crc32.c: remove two instances of trailing
    > whitespaces".

    Okay, I'll massage the changelogs to give them more descriptive subjects, and
    fix the attribution chain. Thank you for the feedback.

    > --
    > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
    > the body of a message to
    > More majordomo info at

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-12-01 21:15    [W:0.028 / U:4.768 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site