[lkml]   [2011]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Linux 3.2-rc1
    On 11/07/2011 06:10 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:

    > Which brings me to a question I already asked on G+ - do people really
    > need the old-fashioned patches? The -rc1 patch is about 22MB gzip-9'd,
    > and part of the reason is that all those renames cause big
    > delete/create diffs. We *could* use git rename patches, but then you'd
    > have to apply them with "git apply" rather than the legacy "patch"
    > executables. But as it is, the patch is almost a third of the size of
    > the tar-ball, which makes me wonder if there's even any point to such
    > a big patch?

    [email was too long/noisy, sorry for the delayed reply.]
    [should I admit that I don't follow you on g+ ?]

    Do you mean files like patch-3.2-rc1.gz or .bz2 or .xz?
    Yes, I use them, but if I am the only user of them, I'll get over it.

    *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-11-09 18:23    [W:0.022 / U:38.408 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site