Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 29 Nov 2011 09:44:48 -0800 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/4] rcu: Make new RCU dynticks API work with nohz cpusets |
| |
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:48:31AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 09:43:42PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 09:22:25PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:24:43PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > > Hi Paul, > > > > > > > > This is an attempt to make the current RCU dynticks API > > > > working with the nohz cpusets. > > > > > > > > I believe the two first patches could be pushed in your trees. > > > > Patches 3 and 4 are rather something I plan to apply in mine, > > > > given they are not needed upstream yet. > > > > > > > > Waiting for your comments. > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > Frederic Weisbecker (4): > > > > rcu: Don't check irq nesting from rcu idle entry/exit > > > > rcu: Irq nesting is always 0 on rcu_enter_idle_common > > > > rcu: New rcu_user_enter() and rcu_user_exit() APIs > > > > rcu: New rcu_user_enter_irq() and rcu_user_exit_irq() APIs > > > > > > For the whole series: > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> > > > > Thank you, Josh! > > > > Does that cover the conflict-resolved versions of the first two? > > > > o https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/28/626 > > o https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/28/624 > > Yes, for the ones with Frederic's further eagle-eyed fix.
Right, https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/28/626 above rather than my erroneous https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/28/621.
Though I thought it was falcon-eyed rather than eagle-eyed. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
| |