Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 25 Nov 2011 10:05:17 +0800 | From | Li Zefan <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 14/14] Change CPUACCT to default n |
| |
> despite it being a not entirely natural fit. Something I proposed at > Prague and that we could explore here is the idea of a co-mounted > controller. In this example it would only be mountable with cpu so > you could always depend on the cpu hierarchy being there; likewise we > can put (jump-labeled) touchpoints within the cpu-subsystem to call > out for updates as appropriate when the co-mount exists. >
IIUC, this co-mounting idea is something I implemented years ago:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/18/389
The use case and the reason it was rejected:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/1/97
-- Li Zefan
| |