lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 14/14] Change CPUACCT to default n
> despite it being a not entirely natural fit.  Something I proposed at
> Prague and that we could explore here is the idea of a co-mounted
> controller. In this example it would only be mountable with cpu so
> you could always depend on the cpu hierarchy being there; likewise we
> can put (jump-labeled) touchpoints within the cpu-subsystem to call
> out for updates as appropriate when the co-mount exists.
>

IIUC, this co-mounting idea is something I implemented years ago:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/18/389

The use case and the reason it was rejected:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/1/97

--
Li Zefan


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-11-25 03:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans