lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Nov]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] block: initialize request_queue's numa node during allocation
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 04:19:58PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:

[..]
> > Storing q->node info at queue allocation time makes sense to me. In fact
> > it might make sense to clean it up from blk_init_allocated_queue_node
> > and assume that passed queue has queue->node set at the allocation time.
> >
> > CCing Mike Snitzer who introduced blk_init_allocated_queue_node(). Mike
> > what do you think. I am not sure it makes sense to pass in nodeid, both
> > at queue allocation and queue initialization time. To me, it should make
> > more sense to allocate the queue at one node and that becomes the default
> > node for reset of the initialization.
>
> Yeah, that makes sense to me too:
>
> From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
> Subject: block: initialize request_queue's numa node during allocation
>
> Set request_queue's node in blk_alloc_queue_node() rather than
> blk_init_allocated_queue_node(). This avoids blk_throtl_init() using
> q->node before it is initialized.
>
> Rename blk_init_allocated_queue_node() to blk_init_allocated_queue().
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>

Thanks Mike. Looks good to me.

Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>

Thanks
Vivek


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-11-22 22:35    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans