lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ext4: remove unneeded variable.
From
Any feedback for this patch? We surely don't need 'ret2' variable in this code.

Thanks & Regards,
Amit Sahrawat

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com> wrote:
> ret2 is not needed in ext4_flush_completed_IO().
>
> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawat83@gmail.com>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/fsync.c |    5 +----
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/fsync.c b/fs/ext4/fsync.c
> index 00a2cb7..40397ac 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/fsync.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/fsync.c
> @@ -81,7 +81,6 @@ int ext4_flush_completed_IO(struct inode *inode)
>        struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(inode);
>        unsigned long flags;
>        int ret = 0;
> -       int ret2 = 0;
>
>        dump_completed_IO(inode);
>        spin_lock_irqsave(&ei->i_completed_io_lock, flags);
> @@ -105,12 +104,10 @@ int ext4_flush_completed_IO(struct inode *inode)
>                 */
>                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ei->i_completed_io_lock, flags);
>                ret = ext4_end_io_nolock(io);
> -               if (ret < 0)
> -                       ret2 = ret;
>                spin_lock_irqsave(&ei->i_completed_io_lock, flags);
>        }
>        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ei->i_completed_io_lock, flags);
> -       return (ret2 < 0) ? ret2 : 0;
> +       return (ret < 0) ? ret : 0;
>  }
>
>  /*
> --
> 1.7.4.4
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-11-17 10:47    [W:0.362 / U:0.340 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site