lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v2] PM/Memory-hotplug: Avoid task freezing failures
Date
The lock_system_sleep() function is used in the memory hotplug code at
several places in order to implement mutual exclusion with hibernation.
However, this function tries to acquire the 'pm_mutex' lock using
mutex_lock() and hence blocks in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state if it doesn't
get the lock. This would lead to task freezing failures and hence
hibernation failure as a consequence, even though the hibernation call path
successfully acquired the lock.

This patch fixes this issue by modifying lock_system_sleep() to use
mutex_trylock() in a loop until the lock is acquired, instead of using
mutex_lock(), in order to avoid going to uninterruptible sleep.
Also, try_to_freeze() is called within the loop, so that we don't cause
freezing failures due to busy looping.

v2: Tejun pointed problems with using mutex_lock_interruptible() in a
while loop, when signals not related to freezing are involved.
So, replaced it with mutex_trylock().

Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

include/linux/suspend.h | 14 +++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/suspend.h b/include/linux/suspend.h
index 57a6924..c2b5aab 100644
--- a/include/linux/suspend.h
+++ b/include/linux/suspend.h
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include <linux/notifier.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/pm.h>
+#include <linux/freezer.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <asm/errno.h>

@@ -380,7 +381,18 @@ static inline void unlock_system_sleep(void) {}

static inline void lock_system_sleep(void)
{
- mutex_lock(&pm_mutex);
+ /*
+ * We should not use mutex_lock() here because, in case we fail to
+ * acquire the lock, it would put us to sleep in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE
+ * state, which would lead to task freezing failures. As a
+ * consequence, hibernation would fail (even though it had acquired
+ * the 'pm_mutex' lock).
+ *
+ * We should use try_to_freeze() in the while loop so that we don't
+ * cause freezing failures due to busy looping.
+ */
+ while (!mutex_trylock(&pm_mutex))
+ try_to_freeze();
}

static inline void unlock_system_sleep(void)


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-11-16 12:59    [W:0.044 / U:0.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site