Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:15:00 -0700 | Subject | Re: Re: HT (Hyper Threading) aware process scheduling doesn't work as it should | From | ffab ffa <> |
| |
are you sure of the cpu terminology? I used few i7-2600K machine and the /proc/cpuinfo shows that the cores thread siblings are 0-4, 1-5, 2-6 and 3-7 can you share your /proc/cpuinfo
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Artem S. Tashkinov <t.artem@lycos.com> wrote: >> On Oct 31, 2011, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: >> >> On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote: >> > > Please make sure both are set to 0. If they were not 0 at the time you >> > > ran your tests, please retest and report back. >> > >> > That's 0 & 0 for me. >> >> How idle is your system during the test? > > load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 > > As I've mentioned great many times I run this test on a completely idle system > (i.e. I even `init 3` in advance to avoid any unexpected CPU usage spikes > caused by unrelated processed). > > I have to insist that people conduct this test on their own without trusting my > words. Probably there's something I overlook or don't fully understand but from > what I see, there's a serious issue here (at least Microsoft XP and 7 work exactly > the way I believe an OS should handle such a load). > > Artem > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |