[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCHv4] DMAEngine: Define interleaved transfer request api
On 7 October 2011 19:49, Vinod Koul <> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 16:57 +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:

>> > I would still argue that if we split this on same lines as current
>> > mechanism, we have clean way to convey all details for both cases.
>> >
>> Do you mean to have separate interleaved transfer apis for Slave
>> and Mem->Mem ? Please clarify.
> If we can make API cleaner and well defined that way then Yes :)
I assume if you suggest you already have an idea....
Please do tell roughly how the api should look for Slave and for Mem->Mem ?

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-07 16:47    [W:0.129 / U:4.696 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site