lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCHv4] DMAEngine: Define interleaved transfer request api
    From
    On 7 October 2011 19:49, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote:
    > On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 16:57 +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:

    >> > I would still argue that if we split this on same lines as current
    >> > mechanism, we have clean way to convey all details for both cases.
    >> >
    >> Do you mean to have separate interleaved transfer apis for Slave
    >> and Mem->Mem ? Please clarify.
    > If we can make API cleaner and well defined that way then Yes :)
    >
    I assume if you suggest you already have an idea....
    Please do tell roughly how the api should look for Slave and for Mem->Mem ?


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-10-07 16:47    [W:0.031 / U:0.072 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site