lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [V3][PATCH 0/7] perf, x86: Implement AMD IBS
    From
    Date
    On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 14:20 +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
    > > The only thing I'm not quite sure on is the userspace bits, but those
    > > are in the future work section as well, but possibly Ingo has a strong
    > > opinion here, sadly he doesn't have email atm :/
    >
    > With Lin's patch 'perf: Remove perf_event_attr::type check' we already
    > can sample with perf record.
    >
    > I think we could extend perf report to parse also ibs samples. The
    > only thing we need for it should be the pmu name/type mapping in the
    > perf.data header and the pmu type in the sample. See my comment on
    > Stephane's patch '[PATCH] perf: make perf.data more self-descriptive
    > (v5)'.

    OK, so Ingo really really wants to see a little more perf integration
    there. Acme, what's the state of Stephane's patch?


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-10-04 10:31    [W:0.020 / U:0.176 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site