lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: kernel.org status: establishing a PGP web of trust
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, Heiko Carstens wrote:

> > I have a question here. In case people are 'reasonably certain' that the
> > old key has never been jeoparadized, why are they required to create a new
> > key?
> >
> > (if the old key would have been compromised, the attacker could as well
> > generate a new key and sign it with the old key himself, so I fail to see
> > any benefit of this PGP excercise).
> >
> > It doesn't make too much sense to force people to live with two different
> > personalities in this "PGP web of trust" world just for the sake of
> > kernel.org, does it?
>
> Also same question here. And as far as I can tell nobody has given an
> answer yet.

In the meantime, at least one reason came up in parallel discussion ... a
lot of people have those oldish keys generated as 1024bit or so, and using
DSA.

And it seems like 4096/RSA is sort of required here.

--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-05 00:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans