[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: big picture UDP/IP performance question re 2.6.18 -> 2.6.32

BFS FAQ writes:

> NUMA aware?
> It is NOT NUMA aware in the sense that it does any fancy shit on NUMA, but
> it will work on NUMA hardware just fine. Only the really big NUMA hardware
> is likely to suffer in performance, and this is theoretically only, since
> no one has that sort of hardware to prove it to me, but it seems almost
> certain.
This part of FAQ entry was written before 0.300, (i.e. more than 2 years ago)

> v0.300 onwards have NUMA enhancements.
And this was added after. =)

As of now, BFS scheduling is NUMA-aware. (see resched_best_mask())

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-04 22:15    [W:0.071 / U:7.340 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site