[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [git patches] libata updates, GPG signed (but see admin notes)
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:33 PM, H. Peter Anvin <> wrote:
> Didn't realize that... I guess I'm too used to named remotes.
> If so, just using a tag should be fine, no?

Yes, that's what I think. But the argument for using a separate
namespace is that
(a) you never get confused
(b) it would make it easier to make the 1:1 relationship between
branch names and these "pull request signature tags" without limiting
the naming of *normal* tags in any way
(c) they do have separate lifetimes from "real" tags.

But seriously, I don't care about the *implementation* all that much.
If people want to use the crazy git "notes" capability, you can do
that too, although quite frankly, I don't see the point. What actually
matters is that "git push" and "git pull" would JustWork(tm), and
check the signature if one exists, without having to cut-and-paste
data that simply shouldn't be visible to the user.

I abhor the interface Ingo suggested, for example. Why would we have
stupid command line options that we should cut-and-paste? Automation
is for computers, not for people.


 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-31 23:41    [W:0.141 / U:2.956 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site