lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/7] Input: ALPS - Remove assumptions about packet size
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:24:37AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 02:17:02PM -0400, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:36:19AM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote:
> > > On 10/26/2011 05:14 PM, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > > > In preparation for version 4 protocol support, which has 8-byte
> > > > data packets, remove all hard-coded assumptions about packet size
> > > > and use psmouse->pktsize instead.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/input/mouse/alps.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
> > > > 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/alps.c b/drivers/input/mouse/alps.c
> > > > index 572cb21..14d1f64 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/input/mouse/alps.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/input/mouse/alps.c
> > > > @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static void alps_flush_packet(unsigned long data)
> > > >
> > > > serio_pause_rx(psmouse->ps2dev.serio);
> > > >
> > > > - if (psmouse->pktcnt == 6) {
> > > > + if (psmouse->pktcnt == psmouse->pktsize) {
> > > >
> > > > /*
> > > > * We did not any more data in reasonable amount of time.
> > > > @@ -365,15 +365,15 @@ static psmouse_ret_t alps_process_byte(struct psmouse *psmouse)
> > > > return PSMOUSE_BAD_DATA;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > - /* Bytes 2 - 6 should have 0 in the highest bit */
> > > > - if (psmouse->pktcnt >= 2 && psmouse->pktcnt <= 6 &&
> > > > + /* Bytes 2 - pktsize should have 0 in the highest bit */
> > > > + if (psmouse->pktcnt >= 2 && psmouse->pktcnt <= psmouse->pktsize &&
> > > > (psmouse->packet[psmouse->pktcnt - 1] & 0x80)) {
> > > > dbg("refusing packet[%i] = %x\n",
> > > > psmouse->pktcnt - 1, psmouse->packet[psmouse->pktcnt - 1]);
> > > > return PSMOUSE_BAD_DATA;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > - if (psmouse->pktcnt == 6) {
> > > > + if (psmouse->pktcnt == psmouse->pktsize) {
> > > > alps_process_packet(psmouse);
> > > > return PSMOUSE_FULL_PACKET;
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -531,8 +531,13 @@ static int alps_tap_mode(struct psmouse *psmouse, int enable)
> > > > static int alps_poll(struct psmouse *psmouse)
> > > > {
> > > > struct alps_data *priv = psmouse->private;
> > > > - unsigned char buf[6];
> > > > + unsigned char *buf;
> > > > bool poll_failed;
> > > > + int ret = -1;
> > > > +
> > > > + buf = kmalloc(psmouse->pktsize, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > + if (!buf)
> > > > + return -1;
> > >
> > > Can we preallocate a buffer somewhere instead of allocating every time
> > > we enter the function? If we know the maximum packet size we could
> > > allocate on the stack instead.
> >
> > Thanks for pointing that out; I had meant to come back and do something
> > about this but forgot. I was hoping to avoid having to hard-code an
> > assumed maximum packet size. I'll take a look at it.
>
> probably doing something like
>
> unsigned char buf[sizeof(psmouse->packet)];
>
> will cover it.

Yes, that will work great. I'll incorporate that into the next version
of the patches. Thanks.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-31 21:03    [W:0.054 / U:1.220 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site