lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRE: [PATCH 2/6] arm/tegra: prepare pinmux code for multiple tegra variants
Peter De Schrijver wrote at Tuesday, October 25, 2011 10:54 AM:
> This patch modifies the pinmux code to be useable for multiple tegra variants.
> Some tegra20 specific constants will be replaced by variables which will be
> initialized to the appropriate value at runtime.

You should probably also mention:
* Removal of include of pinmux-t2.h from pinmux.h.
* The file renames you performed and why.
* The removal of the suspend/resume code and why.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/include/mach/pinmux-t2.h b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/include/mach/pinmux-t2.h
> deleted file mode 100644
> index 4c26263..0000000
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/include/mach/pinmux-t2.h
> +++ /dev/null

So this file shows up as a delete and an add. Isn't there a way to get
it to show up as a rename; I've certainly seen git diff tell me that, but
I'm not sure if the same feature is available for format-patch. In
particular, IIRC from internal review, there weren't any changes to this
file besides direct fallout from the rename, but there were quite a few
symbol name changes in pinmux-t2-tables.c, and also the removal of
suspend/resume, which it'd be nice if the diff highlighted.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/include/mach/pinmux.h b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/include/mach/pinmux.h
> index bb7dfdb..8f6e9f3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/include/mach/pinmux.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/include/mach/pinmux.h
...
> @@ -219,13 +213,20 @@ struct tegra_pingroup_desc {
> s8 pupd_bit; /* offset into the PULL_UPDOWN_REG_* register bit */
> };
>
> -extern const struct tegra_pingroup_desc tegra_soc_pingroups[];
> -extern const struct tegra_drive_pingroup_desc tegra_soc_drive_pingroups[];
> +struct tegra_pinmux_pm {
> + void (*suspend)(void);
> + void (*resume)(void);
> +};

Since we elected to strip out suspend/resume (it's currently incomplete
anyway) to simplify the addition of Tegra30, I don't think you need that
struct type any more.

I wonder if removal of the suspend/resume functions should have been a
separate patch before this?

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pinmux.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pinmux.c
> index 1d20165..0789122 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pinmux.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pinmux.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#endif

I think just include that without any ifdef.

> @@ -668,11 +668,24 @@ void tegra_pinmux_config_pullupdown_table(const struct tegra_pingroup_config *co
> }
> }
>
> +static struct of_device_id tegra_pinmux_of_match[] __devinitdata = {
> + { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-pinmux", tegra20_pinmux_init },
> + { },
> +};
> +
> static int __devinit tegra_pinmux_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct resource *res;
> int i;
> int config_bad = 0;
> + const struct of_device_id *match;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> + match = of_match_device(tegra_pinmux_of_match, &pdev->dev);

What if match==NULL? I suppose that "can't" happen with DT, since the
device wouldn't have been probed unless there was a matching entry...

Does this work when booting without DT; IIRC the internal patches I saw
fell back to hard-coding a call to tegra20_pinmux_init() when booting
a static board file (i.e. not booting device-tree)? Perhaps that's in a
later patch? But either way, it should be here too, so bisectability is
not lost.

> +
> + ((pinmux_init)(match->data))(&pingroups, &pingroup_max,
> + &drive_pingroups, &drive_max);
> +#endif
>
> for (i = 0; ; i++) {
> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, i);

--
nvpublic



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-27 22:03    [W:2.163 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site