Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:34:41 -0700 (PDT) | From | David Rientjes <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: improve error message for p1-check |
| |
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Joe Perches wrote:
> > So we need a combination of the two approaches then, it makes sense to > > only emit the warning if the patched file exists in both prefixes. > > I don't think so. What about something like: > > $ diff -urN kernel/foo~ kernel/foo > patch > > I think we should only care about the patched file,. >
I mean it only makes sense if both prefixes exist (otherwise patch and git-apply will assume it's not a -p0 patch).
| |