Messages in this thread | | | From | Eric Van Hensbergen <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] 9p changes fro merge window | Date | Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:48:59 -0500 |
| |
On Oct 26, 2011, at 7:28 AM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > Anyway, pulled now. I do wish people didn't rebase so much, it makes > all the commits different in linux-next wrt what I actually end up > getting.. >
What's the preferred maintainer workflow? I had been fetching and then rebasing, which seemed to keep my shortlog clean of merge commits and the outstanding patches towards the top. Should I just be pulling from upstream and not caring about the merge commits?
Also, as a point of clarification, if I do get my kernel.org tree back, should I continue to sign tags for pull-requests or was that just for external repos like github?
-eric
| |