lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PULL] module and param
Date
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:33:16 +0200, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> [ Cut-and-paste reply: mentally just "sed s/9p/module/g" ]
>
> So for the merge window, I *really* want the development trees I pull
> from explicitly verified some way.
>
> Putting a signed tag on there somewhere that actually signs the top
> commit *and* mentions the repository and branch it is on (ie github)
> is not wonderfully convenient, but it's at least relatively
> straightforward (do I have a gpg key I can trust?).

I'm not sure if this paranoia is disproportionate or overdue. Hope I
did it right (D1ADB8F1, signed by some other OzLabs folks).

Personally I would have thought that asking people to patch a gpg
fingerprint into MAINTAINERS is more kernely than web of trust. I'll
notice if someone else tries to patch their own in there.

Cheers,
Rusty.

To git@github.com:rustyrussell/linux.git
+ 694136c...b1e4d20 master -> master (forced update)
* [new tag] rusty@rustcorp.com.au-v3.1-2-gb1e4d20 -> rusty@rustcorp.com.au-v3.1-2-gb1e4d20
The following changes since commit c3b92c8787367a8bb53d57d9789b558f1295cc96:

Linux 3.1 (2011-10-24 09:10:05 +0200)

are available in the git repository at:
git://github.com/rustyrussell/linux.git master

Jiri Kosina (1):
kmod: prevent kmod_loop_msg overflow in __request_module()

Michal Schmidt (1):
params: make dashes and underscores in parameter names truly equal

include/linux/moduleparam.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
init/main.c | 4 ++--
kernel/kmod.c | 4 +++-
kernel/params.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-26 04:47    [W:0.057 / U:0.320 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site