lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (block ?)
    From
    On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
    > Hi all,
    >
    > *Note well*
    >
    > This tree has nate had any build testing at all.  As such, it probably
    > doesn't build :-) This tree is really just a roll up of the current state
    > of the trees when the v3.2 merge window opened.  It will not be put into
    > the build system referred to below.
    >

    I have generated a single linux-next (next-20111025) patch on top of
    v3.1, it's approx. 100M!

    $ du -h patch-v3.1-next-20111025.patch
    96M patch-v3.1-next-20111025.patch

    I noticed this build-failure:

    CC block/blk-throttle.o
    CC [M] fs/fuse/dir.o
    /mnt/sdb3/linux-kernel/linux-3.1/debian/build/source_i386_none/block/blk-throttle.c:
    In function 'blk_throtl_drain':
    /mnt/sdb3/linux-kernel/linux-3.1/debian/build/source_i386_none/block/blk-throttle.c:1221:2:
    error: implicit declaration of function 'lockdep_is_held'
    [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

    make[5]: *** [block/blk-throttle.o] Error 1
    make[4]: *** [block] Error 2

    This happens with Debian's gcc-4.6 (4.6.1-16) and default
    KBUILD_ENABLE_EXTRA_GCC_CHECKS value.

    - Sedat -
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-10-25 15:07    [W:0.020 / U:1.320 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site