lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (block ?)
From
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> *Note well*
>
> This tree has nate had any build testing at all.  As such, it probably
> doesn't build :-) This tree is really just a roll up of the current state
> of the trees when the v3.2 merge window opened.  It will not be put into
> the build system referred to below.
>

I have generated a single linux-next (next-20111025) patch on top of
v3.1, it's approx. 100M!

$ du -h patch-v3.1-next-20111025.patch
96M patch-v3.1-next-20111025.patch

I noticed this build-failure:

CC block/blk-throttle.o
CC [M] fs/fuse/dir.o
/mnt/sdb3/linux-kernel/linux-3.1/debian/build/source_i386_none/block/blk-throttle.c:
In function 'blk_throtl_drain':
/mnt/sdb3/linux-kernel/linux-3.1/debian/build/source_i386_none/block/blk-throttle.c:1221:2:
error: implicit declaration of function 'lockdep_is_held'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

make[5]: *** [block/blk-throttle.o] Error 1
make[4]: *** [block] Error 2

This happens with Debian's gcc-4.6 (4.6.1-16) and default
KBUILD_ENABLE_EXTRA_GCC_CHECKS value.

- Sedat -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-25 15:07    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans