Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:04:53 +0200 | | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (block ?) | | From | Sedat Dilek <> |
| |
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > Hi all, > > *Note well* > > This tree has nate had any build testing at all. As such, it probably > doesn't build :-) This tree is really just a roll up of the current state > of the trees when the v3.2 merge window opened. It will not be put into > the build system referred to below. >
I have generated a single linux-next (next-20111025) patch on top of v3.1, it's approx. 100M!
$ du -h patch-v3.1-next-20111025.patch 96M patch-v3.1-next-20111025.patch
I noticed this build-failure:
CC block/blk-throttle.o CC [M] fs/fuse/dir.o /mnt/sdb3/linux-kernel/linux-3.1/debian/build/source_i386_none/block/blk-throttle.c: In function 'blk_throtl_drain': /mnt/sdb3/linux-kernel/linux-3.1/debian/build/source_i386_none/block/blk-throttle.c:1221:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'lockdep_is_held' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[5]: *** [block/blk-throttle.o] Error 1 make[4]: *** [block] Error 2
This happens with Debian's gcc-4.6 (4.6.1-16) and default KBUILD_ENABLE_EXTRA_GCC_CHECKS value.
- Sedat - -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |