[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: status: establishing a PGP web of trust
On 10/02/11 04:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, October 02, 2011, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 10/01/2011 06:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> OK, I'm taking this as "5 years is fine by us". :-)
>>> And the recommended procedure for rotating keys seems to be (1) generate
>>> a new key and (2) make as many people as you can sign it before the old
>>> one expires, right?
>> (3) revoke the old key with a status code of "no longer in use", or just
>> let it expire.
>>>> Some people have decided to opt for an unlimited key, but that
>>>> *requires* that you have a way to revoke the old key, which is why we
>>>> are considering a key revocation escrow service.
>>> That service will be necessary anyway in case some keys are lost or
>>> compromised.
>>> I wonder what the procedure of restoring access in case one
>>> has lost keys is supposed to be?
>> Get a new key and get it re-signed.
> Hmm. That doesn't seem very practical if someone doesn't live close
> to any other core kernel developers.
> What number of signatures on the key will be regarded as sufficient?
>> We can work out specific details at KS.
> Well, the KS is going to be busy time this year I suppose. :-)
> What about people who haven't been invited to the KS?

They (we) should start building a web of trust with local key signings.
I'm already working on that in Portland, Oregon.

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-02 20:39    [W:0.243 / U:4.036 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site