Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [Patch] Increase USBFS Bulk Transfer size | From | Valdis.Kletnieks@vt ... | Date | Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:47:13 -0400 |
| |
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 05:42:44 +0200, Markus Rechberger said:
> The inflexible device which uses 24064 bytes works with all other > Operating systems by using that value > and gives exactly the same results with other transfer sizes than that.
-ENOPARSE. If it's inflexible, how did you get results for other transfer sizes? And if other transfer sizes give exactly the same results, why can't you just use those instead?
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |