Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:01:59 -0700 | From | Jeremy Fitzhardinge <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC V3 2/8] stop_machine: make stop_machine safe and efficient to call early |
| |
On 10/10/2011 12:34 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > >> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:18:03 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote: >>> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> >>> >>> Make stop_machine() safe to call early in boot, before stop_machine() >>> has been set up, by simply calling the callback function directly if >>> there's only one CPU online. >> Not that you need this, since it's >90% Tejun's code now, but: >> >> Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> > hey, extra review is always useful. > > Jeremy, Tejun, what's the expected merge path of these changes?
Andrew has already picked up the stop_machine patch, I think. But it's pretty settled now, so it shouldn't cause any problem if it gets via multiple paths.
What about the jump-label stuff? Has that been going via tip.git in the past, or by some other path?
J
| |