lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 09/32] drm/radeon: use system_wq instead of dev_priv->wq
From
Date
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 19:21 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> > With cmwq, there's no reason for radeon to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
> >
> > Because radeon_driver_irq_uninstall_kms() may be called from
> > unsleepable context, the work items can't be flushed from there.
> > Instead, init and flush from radeon_irq_kms_init/fini().
> >
> > While at it, simplify canceling/flushing of rdev->pm.dynpm_idle_work.
> > Always initialize and sync cancel instead of being unnecessarily smart
> > about it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
> > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > ---
> > Only compile tested. Please feel free to take it into the subsystem
> > tree or simply ack - I'll route it through the wq tree.
>
> Patch looks good to me. I'm not sure what's the best way to send this
> upstream. I'm working on some irq changes in the same area now, so
> I'd prefer if we pushed it through Dave's tree, but I can handle it
> either way.

I'll pull it into my tree for merging to Linus.

Dave.

>
> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
>




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-01-06 05:35    [W:0.093 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site