lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 21/32] fs/aio: aio_wq isn't used in memory reclaim path
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 09:50:57AM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> > Yeap. Do you agree that the concurrency limit is necessary? If not,
> > we can just put everything onto system_wq.
>
> I'm not sure whether it's strictly necessary (there may very well be a
> need for this in the usb gadgetfs code), but keeping it the same at
> least seems safe.

Limiting concurrency on aio requests is exactly the opposite of what the
usb gadgetfs requires. It's similarly bad for filesystem aio when there's
a mix of small and large requests in flight.

-ben


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-01-05 16:31    [W:0.083 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site