lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 21 Jan 2011 09:52:27 -0500
FromAlan Ott <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/1] HID: Report Descriptor in Sysfs
On 01/21/2011 04:59 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Alan Ott wrote:
>
>
>> So I'd like to have access to the HID report descriptor in a sysfs entry, so
>> I can read it without opening the device. hid-core seemed like the place to
>> put it.
>>
>> Using the /sys/class links, for hidraw devices, this puts a new file,
>> report_descriptor in the directory:
>> /sys/class/hidraw/hidraw0/device/
>>
>> For my USB device (for example), the new file is in:
>> /sys/bus/usb/devices/1-5.3:1.0/0003:046D:C216.0001/
>>
>> For my Bluetooth device, the new file is in:
>> /sys/class/bluetooth/hci0/hci0:11/0005:054C:0268.0002/
>>
>> I'm not super confident that these file locations are the best place, but I
>> made a best guess so that it could be discussed. The current location is
>> where the hid-core stuff lives. Is there a reason these directories are
>> named bus:vendor:product:id (instead of hid-core or something similar)? Is
>> there a better way to do this?
>>
> the report descriptor is provided through debugfs HID interface already.
> Do you feel like that's not enough?
>

Hi Jiri,

Maybe it is. To be honest I didn't check debugfs. I have two concerns
about it:
1. Is it wise for userspace programs to rely on:
a. debugfs being mounted,
b. its mount point, or
c. the location or contents of any file in debugfs?
2. /sys/kernel/debug/0003:046D:C216.0002/rdesc is mode 0400 on my system
(root-only read). Is there a reason it's so restrictive, or could it be
changed to 0444?

Alan.




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-01-21 15:55    [from the cache]
©2003-2010