Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:14:55 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH -v10 0/4] Lock-less list |
| |
* huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > But will all that stuff be accepted? Please stop sending infrastructure bits and > > focus on your larger RAS picture, once you have consensus on that from all > > parties involved, then, and only then, does it make sense to submit everything, > > including infrastructure. > > I am not sending hardware error reporting infrastructure. As far as I know, Linus > and Andrew suggest to use printk for hardware error reporting. And now, I just > try to write APEI driver and reporting hardware error with printk. Is it > acceptable? Do you have some other idea about hardware error reporting?
Erm, how could you possible have missed the perf based RAS daemon work of Boris, which we've pointed out about half a dozen times already?
It's somewhat annoying that you simply ignore repeated feedback and feign ignorance. Reminds me of someone :-)
Ingo
| |