[lkml]   [2011]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] Re: autogroup: sched_setscheduler() fails
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 01:40:32PM +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Bharata B Rao
> <> wrote:
> >> Unless I fscked up, set_task_rq() is the group change.  As soon as the
> >> task's class changes, it'll be moved to the root_task_group.
> >
> > Ok, this is what I understand, may be Peter Z can confirm...
> >
> > set_task_rq() just changes the task's cfs_rq and rt_rq as per its
> > task_group(). The normal way to change a task's group is to first
> > change its cgroup pointer (task->cgroups, see cgroup_attach_task())
> > After this you change the runqueues by calling set_task_rq() which
> > now refers to new group's runqueues.
> >
> > In your code, I don't see where you really change task's group. AFAICS,
> > it continues to remain in the same autogroup.
> IMHO, task->cgroups will not change when autogroup take effect.

Yes and I believe this is cause for some of the weird semantics I see
with autogroup and cgroups. I am not sure if this has already been
discussed ealier, may be I need to go back and check the archives, but
consider this:

I have cpu cgroup mounted at /cgroup and see that all the tasks in the
system are listed in /cgroup/tasks file.

Now I start a task like this:

# ./while1 &
[1] 2761

and see that this task belongs to root cgroup.

# grep 2761 /cgroup/tasks

But we know that this task really belongs to an autogroup and is not
sitting directly on root_task_group.

# cat /proc/2761/autogroup
/autogroup-49 nice 0

So we have a task in an autogroup (which is a sub group of root_task_group)
but is being shown as part of root_task_group. Is this by design ?

Now say I create a sub cgroup and move this task to it.

# mkdir /cgroup/1
# echo 2671 > /cgroup/1/tasks

So now the task moved to a real cgroup.

# cat /cgroup/1/tasks

But the /proc/2761/autogroup isn't updated. It still shows
/autogroup-49 nice 0

May be this was all discussed earlier as I noted in the beginning, but I find
this semantics a bit unusual.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-01-12 07:39    [W:0.074 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site