lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 05/10] vmscan: Synchrounous lumpy reclaim use lock_page() instead trylock_page()
    Date
    > On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:04:48 +0900
    > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
    >
    > > On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 11:47:28 +0100
    > > Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote:
    > >
    > > > From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
    > > >
    > > > With synchrounous lumpy reclaim, there is no reason to give up to reclaim
    > > > pages even if page is locked. This patch uses lock_page() instead of
    > > > trylock_page() in this case.
    > > >
    > > > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
    > > > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
    > >
    > > Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
    > >
    > Ah......but can't this change cause dead lock ??

    Yes, this patch is purely crappy. please drop. I guess I was poisoned
    by poisonous mushroom of Mario Bros.






    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-09-09 06:17    [W:0.023 / U:1.184 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site