lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 05/10] vmscan: Synchrounous lumpy reclaim use lock_page() instead trylock_page()
Date
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:04:48 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 11:47:28 +0100
> > Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote:
> >
> > > From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > >
> > > With synchrounous lumpy reclaim, there is no reason to give up to reclaim
> > > pages even if page is locked. This patch uses lock_page() instead of
> > > trylock_page() in this case.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> >
> Ah......but can't this change cause dead lock ??

Yes, this patch is purely crappy. please drop. I guess I was poisoned
by poisonous mushroom of Mario Bros.






\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-09-09 06:17    [W:0.280 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site