| | Date | Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:04:48 +0900 | | From | KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 05/10] vmscan: Synchrounous lumpy reclaim use lock_page() instead trylock_page() |
| |
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 11:47:28 +0100 Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote:
> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> > > With synchrounous lumpy reclaim, there is no reason to give up to reclaim > pages even if page is locked. This patch uses lock_page() instead of > trylock_page() in this case. > > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
|