[lkml]   [2010]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/7 v3] HID: magicmouse: don't allow hidinput to initialize the device
    On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Jiri Slaby <> wrote:
    > On 09/02/2010 02:06 PM, Michael Poole wrote:
    >> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
    >>> On 09/02/2010 01:57 AM, Michael Poole wrote:
    >>>> Jiri Slaby wrote:
    >>>>> This looks weird. Is there any past discussion about why you cannot use
    >>>>> hidinput and you have to do all the input bits yourself while cheating
    >>>>> this very weird way?
    >>>> The Magic Mouse and Magic Trackpad do not publish HID descriptors for
    >>>> the multitouch reports.  Given the variable-length report packets --
    >>>> and especially the Magic Trackpad's new, mutant DOUBLE_REPORT_ID
    >>>> packets -- it would be non-trivial to write accurate descriptors that
    >>>> the HID core can use.  (Someone wrote a patch to try that a few months
    >>>> ago.  It ended up adding significantly more lines to hid-magicmouse.c
    >>>> than it removed, and it was not obvious to me that it got the Report
    >>>> Count fields correct.)
    >>> Ok, makes sense. The proper solution is to call a driver hook in
    >>> hidinput_connect to do the mapping instead of report parsing done there,
    >>> right? (And not setting [gs]etkeycode in that case.)
    >> I do not know how this would work with the current HID core; could you
    >> elaborate?
    > No way. You would have to implement that.
    >>  For the Magic Mouse, there is a valid descriptor for the
    >> 0x10 (traditional mouse motion and clicks) report, and a pretty
    >> trivial descriptor in the vendor-defined usage region (which I assume
    >> Apple drivers use to identify the ensemble of multi-touch,
    >> mouse-up/down, laser status and battery level reports).  How would the
    >> driver's input_mapping() hook, or any other hook, map that single
    >> descriptor into fields for each of the parts of a multi-touch report,
    >> or support the other reports?  How would hid-magicmouse describe the
    >> report so that hid-core handles the variable-length multi-touch
    >> reports properly?  As far as I can tell, hid_report_raw_event() and
    >> its callees assume each report has fixed length.
    > If I understand correctly, you have 2 reports. One report is standard
    > HID and one is very specific and broken.
    > 1) I don't understand where events from the standard report are going
    > now while no output is claimed. In other words, why you return from
    > raw_event in the default case 0, there is nobody to eat the data, right?

    hid-magicmouse.c parses the standard-compliant report. It is the
    "case 0x10:" handler.

    > 2) You handle events from the broken (or missing) report in
    > magicmouse_raw_event and it will remain as is.
    > So in the end there will be some .parse_reports hook called from inside
    > hidinput_connect or somewhere instead of parsing and you will do the job
    > you currently do in magicmouse_setup_input except the input structure
    > setup (this will be done generically in hid core).
    > The approach you have now is prone to errors, because somebody in the
    > future may add a new claimant without bearing in mind to update these
    > drivers.

    What input_dev should this use for delivering events from the
    non-standard report? The only way I saw (or see) for hid-magicmouse
    to get the (hid-input-created) input_dev for the mouse is to look at
    hid_device->report_enum[HID_INPUT_REPORT].report_list to get a struct
    hid_report*, then use hid_report->field[0]->hidinput->input. That
    seemed more fragile and abstraction-breaking than the existing

    Right now, the device-specific driver's raw_event hook gets the first
    shot at parsing any report; hid-core and hid-input process reports for
    which raw_event returns 0. If someone adds a new kind of claimant
    that gets higher priority than both of those categories, by definition
    it wouldn't be an error for it to supersede hid-magicmouse's handler.

    Michael Poole
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-09-04 03:13    [W:0.028 / U:9.260 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site