lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [tip:perf/urgent] perf, x86: Catch spurious interrupts after disabling counters
    On 29.09.10 11:33:07, Stephane Eranian wrote:
    > There is something else bothering me with cpuc->running.
    >
    > It is not reset outside of the interrupt handler. So what if
    > event scheduling shuffles things around and an event is
    > moved somewhere else. Don't you need to clear the
    > cpuc->running[idx] for the old counter index?

    We can clear it only in the NMI handler, because the next NMI after
    stopping a counter must mark the counter as handled. This may cause
    some false positives, but it is the best we can get.

    -Robert

    --
    Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
    Operating System Research Center



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-09-29 19:29    [W:0.025 / U:124.884 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site