Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | | From | David Howells <> | | Subject | [PATCH 4/5] mn10300: Get rid of set_fs(USER_DS) in sigframe setup | | Date | Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:48:04 +0100 |
| |
From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
The set_fs(USER_DS) in the signal frame setup code really has no business being there; short of a serious kernel bug we should already have USER_DS at that point. It shouldn't have been done on x86 either...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> --- arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c | 4 ---- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c b/arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c index 5a2c004..ae36480 100644 --- a/arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c +++ b/arch/mn10300/kernel/signal.c @@ -333,8 +333,6 @@ static int setup_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, sigset_t *set, regs->d0 = sig; regs->d1 = (unsigned long) &frame->sc; - set_fs(USER_DS); - /* the tracer may want to single-step inside the handler */ if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP)) ptrace_notify(SIGTRAP); @@ -416,8 +414,6 @@ static int setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info, regs->d0 = sig; regs->d1 = (long) &frame->info; - set_fs(USER_DS); - /* the tracer may want to single-step inside the handler */ if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP)) ptrace_notify(SIGTRAP);
|  |