lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.6.36-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.35
    Date
    [Trimming the CC list.]

    On Monday, September 20, 2010, Sedat Dilek wrote:
    > Hi Rafael,
    >
    > can you please add the following, Thanks in advance.
    > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18872
    > > Subject : Radeon KMS r100 and STR problems
    > > Submitter : Richard Mittendorfer <delist@gmx.net>
    > > Date : 2010-09-17 18:26 (4 days old)
    > > Message-ID : <20100917202647.aa4b6300.delist@gmx.net>
    > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128474802809779&w=2
    >
    > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
    > > This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.35,
    > > for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
    > > If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
    > >
    > > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.35, please let us
    > > know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know
    > > if any of the entries below are invalid.
    > >
    > > Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply
    > > to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling
    > > the issue.
    > >
    > >
    > > Listed regressions statistics:
    > >
    > > Date Total Pending Unresolved
    > > ----------------------------------------
    > > 2010-09-20 38 15 15
    > > 2010-09-12 28 14 13
    > > 2010-08-30 21 16 15
    > >
    > >
    > > Unresolved regressions
    >
    > Hi Rafael,
    >
    > can you please add the following Bug, Thanks in advance.
    >
    > Bug-Entry : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16140
    > Subject : Suspend To RAM/ Resume broken - Radeon KMS on RV250
    > Submitter : Michael Long <harn-solo@gmx.de>
    > Date : 2010-06-06 09:52
    > Message-ID : ???
    > References : ???
    >
    > What is with "Regression: No" in the BR? Change?

    Yes, but according to the comments in there, it is a regression from 2.6.33.
    I marked is as such and linked it to the appropriate meta-bug entry, but we're
    not going to list it, because we only list post-2.6.34 (and post-2.6.35)
    regressions in the current cycle.

    Thanks,
    Rafael


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-09-20 21:51    [W:0.024 / U:29.072 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site