lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Sep]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] PM: Prevent waiting forever on asynchronous resume after abort
Date
On Thursday, September 02, 2010, Colin Cross wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Colin Cross wrote:
> >
> >> >> I think it would be better to change device_pm_init() and add a
> >> >> complete_all().
> >> >
> >> > I agree.
> >> That would work, and was my first solution, but it increases the
> >> reliance on the completion variable being left completed between state
> >> transitions, which is undocumented and unnecessary. It seems more
> >> straightforward to me to only wait on the parent if the parent is
> >> suspended.
> >
> > How about calling complete_all() from within dpm_prepare() as well?
> > Then it will get initialized properly at the beginning of every sleep
> > transition.
> That would work, but I still don't see why it's better. With either
> of your changes, the power.completion variable is storing state, and
> not just used for notification. However, the exact meaning of that
> state is unclear, especially during the transition from an aborted
> suspend to resume, and the state is duplicating power.status. Setting
> it to complete in dpm_prepare is especially confusing, because at that
> point nothing is completed, it hasn't even been started.

It just sets the initial value. But I agree it would be cleaner to do that
during the initialization.

Thanks,
Rafael


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-09-02 23:25    [W:0.052 / U:0.692 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site