Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: hpet: Avoid the readback penalty | From | Nix <> | Date | Sat, 18 Sep 2010 14:43:06 +0100 |
| |
On 18 Sep 2010, Damien Wyart uttered the following:
> * Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> [2010-09-15 15:11]: >> > x86: hpet: Work around hardware stupidity > >> After my brain recovered from yesterdays exposure with the x86 timer >> horror, I came up with a different solution for this problem, which >> avoids the readback of the compare register completely. It works >> nicely on my affected ATI system, but needs some exposure to the other >> machines. > > Comments for this different solution seemed fine, but it seems only the > first one was commited into mainline and then stable. Is this intended?
I assumed he was letting people shake the bugs out rather than inflict what is basically just a performance improvement on -stable. For the record: no bugs here. I also know why one of my machines was unaffected, and it provides even more confirmation that this bug is correctly identified, as if we needed more. It's not using the HPET at all:
Clock Event Device: cs5535-clockevt
Every single machine I owned with an HPET was affected by this bug: they all work perfectly well now.
| |