Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 18 Sep 2010 11:08:27 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] opp: introduce library for device-specific OPPs |
| |
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 07:45:43PM +0300, Phil Carmody wrote: > On 17/09/10 17:36 +0200, ext Mark Brown wrote:
> > It might be clearer to use some term other than enabled in the code - > > when reading I wasn't immediately sure if enabled meant that it was > > available to be selected or if it was the active operating point. How > ^^^^^^^^^ > > about 'allowed' (though I'm not 100% happy with that)?
> I think your query contains its own answer.
Yeah, I didn't pick that because all of them are available in the sense that they could in the future be enabled but I do think it's the best option.
| |