lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Sep]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] oom: remove totalpage normalization from oom_badness()
From
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 9:57 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>>
>> > Current oom_score_adj is completely broken because It is strongly bound
>> > google usecase and ignore other all.
>> >
>>
>> We've talked about this issue three times already.  The last two times
>> you've sent a revert patch, you failed to followup on the threads:
>>
>>       http://marc.info/?t=128272938200002
>>       http://marc.info/?t=128324705200002
>>
>> And now you've gone above Andrew, who is the maintainer of this code, and
>> straight to Linus.  Between that and your failure to respond to my answers
>> to your questions, I'm really stunned at how unprofessional you've handled
>> this.
>
> Selfish must die. you failed to persuade to me. and I havgen't get anyone's objection.
> Then, I don't care your ugly whining.

I haven't followed the discussion at all so I hope you don't mind me
jumping in. Are there some real-world bug reports where OOM rewrite is
to blame? Why haven't those been fixed?

Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-09-16 09:49    [W:0.071 / U:0.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site