Messages in this thread | | | From | "Masayuki Ohtake" <> | Subject | Re: [MeeGo-Dev][PATCH v2] Topcliff: Update PCH_CAN driver to 2.6.35 | Date | Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:55:54 +0900 |
| |
Hi Wolfgang Grandegger
According to your policy, we will remove filter processing so that all packets can be received.
Thanks, Ohtake(OKISemi) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wolfgang Grandegger" <wg@grandegger.com> To: "Masayuki Ohtake" <masa-korg@dsn.okisemi.com> Cc: "Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>; <arjan@linux.intel.com>; "Tomoya MORINAGA" <morinaga526@dsn.okisemi.com>; <yong.y.wang@intel.com>; <gregkh@suse.de>; <qi.wang@intel.com>; <andrew.chih.howe.khor@intel.com>; <meego-dev@meego.com>; <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; <socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de>; "Samuel Ortiz" <sameo@linux.intel.com>; "Barry Song" <21cnbao@gmail.com>; "Christian Pellegrin" <chripell@fsfe.org>; "Wolfram Sang" <w.sang@pengutronix.de>; "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 6:10 PM Subject: Re: [MeeGo-Dev][PATCH v2] Topcliff: Update PCH_CAN driver to 2.6.35
> On 09/16/2010 10:51 AM, Masayuki Ohtake wrote: > > Hi Marc, > > > >> - Please remove rx-filter handling from the driver completely, simply > >> receive every can frame > > > > This rx-filter function is for Topcliff's CAN HW function. > > This function is important. > > Could you tell us the reason why should we remove filter function ? > > We do not (yet) support the filtering capability of the CAN controller > hardware. Therefore please configure the hardware filter to accept *any* > CAN message like all other drivers do, e.g.: > > http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v2.6.35.4/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c#L249 > > Wolfgang. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >
| |