Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 Sep 2010 08:55:21 +0800 | Subject | Re: active memory - ok, but per process ? | From | jovi zhang <> |
| |
I'm not a vm subsystem experts, but maybe I can give my own comments. Actually it's hard to maintenance per-process active pages. active pages include many file page caches, not only per-process pages, these caches don't belong to any process.(like some share library code page). So apparantly there have many common active mm through all process. is this active mm number useful for you? Maybe you can take some useful number like RSS & VSZ .(ps aux)
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:29 AM, <devzero@web.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > pardon - a user question, most likely for vm subsystem experts. > I`m searching for this for a while and don`t know any further..... > > as we know , > > cat /proc/meminfo |grep Active > Active: 139916 > kB > > gives the " Memory that has been used more recently and usually not reclaimed unless absolutely necessary." > > I wonder - isn`t there a way to break that down on a per-process basis ? (to see which process is the most active memory "consumer") > > regards > Roland > ___________________________________________________________ > Neu: WEB.DE De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief! > Jetzt De-Mail-Adresse reservieren: https://produkte.web.de/go/demail02 > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |