lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Sep]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the final tree (tip treee related)
On 09/12/2010 08:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the scsi-post-merge tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allnoconfig, i386 defconfig and others) produced these warnings (I build
> with CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y):
>
> WARNING: mm/built-in.o(.text+0x25910): Section mismatch in reference from the function memblock_find_in_range() to the function .init.text:memblock_find_base()
> The function memblock_find_in_range() references
> the function __init memblock_find_base().
> This is often because memblock_find_in_range lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of memblock_find_base is wrong.

please check it, and it should get into core/memblock branch.

Thanks

Yinghai

[PATCH] memblock: Fix section mismatch warning

for arches that use memblock other than x86

Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <Yinghai@kernel.org>

---
mm/memblock.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/mm/memblock.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/memblock.c
+++ linux-2.6/mm/memblock.c
@@ -125,8 +125,8 @@ static phys_addr_t __init memblock_find_
return MEMBLOCK_ERROR;
}

-static phys_addr_t __init memblock_find_base(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align,
- phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
+static phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_base(phys_addr_t size,
+ phys_addr_t align, phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
{
long i;

@@ -439,12 +439,12 @@ long __init_memblock memblock_remove(phy
return __memblock_remove(&memblock.memory, base, size);
}

-long __init memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
+long __init_memblock memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
{
return __memblock_remove(&memblock.reserved, base, size);
}

-long __init memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
+long __init_memblock memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
{
struct memblock_type *_rgn = &memblock.reserved;

@@ -693,7 +693,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_is_region_r
}


-void __init memblock_set_current_limit(phys_addr_t limit)
+void __init_memblock memblock_set_current_limit(phys_addr_t limit)
{
memblock.current_limit = limit;
}

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-09-13 06:19    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site