Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:59:17 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Enabling patches of 2 early consoles for Intel MID platforms |
| |
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:40:45AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > This serie mainly enables 2 early consoles named mrst and hsu for > > Intel MID platforms. please help to review, thanks, > > > > - Feng > > > > Changelog: > > v3: > > * Fix a warning for mrst.h > > * Add 2 helper funcs for fixed address mapping as > > suggested by Ingo > > * Rename the mrst_earlyprintk.c to early_printk_mrst.c > > * Clean the code and fix typoes upon Ingo's comments > > v2: > > * Code clean as suggested by Ingo > > Thanks, this series looks really good! > > > Feng Tang (4): > > x86, mrst: make mrst_identify_cpu() inlne inside mrst.h > > x86: add two helper macros for fixed address mapping > > x86, earlyprintk: add earlyprintk for Intel Moorestown platform > > x86, earlyprintk: add hsu early console for Intel Medfield platform > > > > arch/x86/Kconfig.debug | 4 + > > arch/x86/include/asm/fixmap.h | 15 ++ > > arch/x86/include/asm/mrst.h | 10 +- > > arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 1 + > > arch/x86/kernel/early_printk.c | 13 ++ > > arch/x86/kernel/early_printk_mrst.c | 319 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 6 files changed, 361 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > mode change 100644 => 100755 arch/x86/include/asm/fixmap.h > > create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/early_printk_mrst.c > > Wrt. integration: i'd prefer to carry these four patches in the > tip:x86/early-printk tree (to be merged into v2.6.37), because > there's some interaction with other x86 bits.
No objection from me.
> AFAICS the two serial patches: > > [PATCH 1/2] serial: mrst_max3110: some code cleanup > [PATCH 2/2] mrst_max3110: Make the IRQ option runtime > > Are structurally independent from the earlyprintk patches and could be > carried separately in the serial tree. > > Alan, Greg, what's your preference?
I can carry these in the tty tree fine. They don't depend on the x86 patches, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
| |