Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 13 Sep 2010 08:56:39 -0700 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] x86: don't compile with gcc-3.3.3 |
| |
On 09/13/2010 01:39 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 10:31 +0200, florian@mickler.org wrote: >> hpa commented on bug 16506[1] : >> "Please note that gcc-3.3.3 is known broken on x86; gcc-3.4 is the oldest >> version which is known to *not* be broken." >> >> References: >> [0]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16633 >> [1]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16506#c28 >> >> If that is indeed so, we should abort the build? No? > > Does it in fact still build with 3.4? I seem to recall some talk about > pushing the minimum version to 4.x for x86, although I can't remember > where..
It does indeed still build with 3.4, although it is giving us a bunch of headaches to *make it so*, and I would personally be really glad if the consensus is we can just axe it.
The only reason to not abort the build for gcc 3.3.3 is that soem "enterprise" distros have been shipping gcc 3.3.3 with backported fixes from 3.4, which of course still identifies themselves as gcc 3.3.3, and so technically it is iompossioble to tell if any particular "gcc 3.3.3" is actually broken or not.
However, as far as I can tell, most of the people who build current x86 kernels with gcc 3.x are people who are testing building current kernels with gcc 3.x. Some of the embedded systems are different, because for some strange reasons most of the embedded world seem stuck on gcc 3.4 or so.
-hpa
-- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
| |