lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: disabling group leader perf_event

    * Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:

    > On Sun 2010-09-12 20:48:43, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > >
    > > * Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:
    > >
    > > > On 09/12/2010 08:46 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
    > > > > 1- Most (least abstract) specific code: a block of bytecode in the form
    > > > > of a simplified, executable, kernel-checked x86 machine code block -
    > > > > this is also the fastest form. [yes, this is actually possible.]
    > > > >Well... if we want to be a bit x86-entric.... can we just reuse ACPI
    > > > >interpretter?
    > > >
    > > > I hope this was a joke, ACPI won the academy awards for ugliness,
    > > > ..., bad specification, non-generality, and
    >
    > As did i386 instruction set :-).

    Are you kidding? The i386 instruction set may be ugly, but it's
    implemented in hardware, which has obvious upsides.

    The ACPI AML code is just plain ugly.

    Ingo


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-09-12 22:35    [W:0.023 / U:0.700 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site